VE-CAM-S — Visual EEG Confusion Assessment Method Severity
2022A 0-20 visually interpreted EEG scale for acute encephalopathy severity across delirium and coma. It requires clinical EEG and trained interpretation and is not a stand-alone delirium diagnosis.
Emerging context
Clinician-scored EEG research scale spanning delirium and coma rather than a routine bedside form. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.
What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence
VE-CAM-S is a visually scored EEG scale for grading acute encephalopathy across the clinical spectrum from delirium to coma. Unlike E-CAM-S, it does not depend on automated quantitative feature extraction. A clinician identifies specified patterns on a standard EEG and combines weighted findings into a total from 0 to 20. Lower-weight findings include abnormalities of sleep transients, slowing, rhythmic activity, voltage and periodic discharges; intermittent attenuation receives greater weight, while predefined severe encephalopathy patterns receive the maximum score. Higher totals indicate greater physiological severity. The scale does not establish delirium by itself and is not a substitute for clinical assessment.
Tesh and colleagues prospectively studied 404 adult inpatients undergoing clinical EEG at one academic centre: 132 had neither delirium nor coma, 143 had delirium and 129 had coma. The model was developed using nested five-fold cross-validation. VE-CAM-S correlated with CAM-S long-form severity at 0.67. It achieved an area under the curve of 0.85 when contrasting CAM-S zero with CAM-S four or above and was associated with in-hospital mortality, three-month mortality and functional status at discharge.
The evidence remains developmental. EEG was ordered for clinical reasons, so the cohort is not representative of unselected hospital patients. Most participants were assessed only once, some clinical ratings were not closely contemporaneous with the scored EEG epoch, and routine and long-term recordings were mixed. The scale also grades coma and severe encephalopathy rather than specifically identifying delirium aetiology. It belongs in the emerging physiological register and should be described as requiring EEG acquisition and trained interpretation.
Evidence and practical details
- Full name
- Visual EEG Confusion Assessment Method Severity
- Catalogue class
- Emerging context
- Record type
- context-emerging
- Family
- eeg-delirium-severity-family
- Purpose
- Severity measurement, physiological, Detailed research assessment
- Population
- Adults undergoing clinical EEG across ICU and non-ICU inpatient wards
- Setting
- General / acute hospital, Intensive care
- Items
- —
- Administration
- visual interpretation of a clinical EEG by a trained reader; exact scoring time not reported
- Evidence
- No eligible DTA study identified
- Evidence maturity
- prospective-derivation-with-internal-cross-validation
- Evidence stage
- emerging-development-or-derivation
- DTA studies identified
- 0
- Reference type
- Prospective single-centre derivation with nested five-fold internal cross-validation
- Validation sample
- n = 404
- Cut-off / scoring
- No stand-alone delirium diagnostic threshold
- Original/source citation
- Tesh RA, Sun H, Jing J, et al. VE-CAM-S: Visual EEG-Based Grading of Delirium Severity and Associations With Clinical Outcomes Critical Care Explorations. 2022;4(1):e0611. PMID 35072078
Format and clearly labelled links
A trained reader identifies weighted findings on a standard EEG. Ordinary findings contribute 1, 2, 4 or 6 points, while predefined severe encephalopathy patterns receive 20. Higher totals indicate greater acute encephalopathy severity.
Rights, version and permission record
- Instrument access state
- No verified public instrument form
- Instrument host
- No verified instrument host
- Current instrument/version note
- VE-CAM-S research model and BDSP project v1.0; source model published 2022
- Rights holder
- Not yet verified
- Licence / rights basis
- No licence verified
- Rights checked
- 2026-07-19
- Rights-holder contact
- Not yet verified
Permission scope recorded at the last check
- Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
- Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
- Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
- Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
- EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
- Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.
Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.
Page record and review status
- Page version
- 3.1.0
- Last factual/source check
- 2026-07-19
- Last rights/link check
- 2026-07-19
- Curator and responsible editor
- Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
- Independent external clinical review
- Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.
Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.
* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.