E-CAM-S — Electroencephalographic Confusion Assessment Method Severity Score
2022An automated 0-1 research estimate of delirium and encephalopathy severity derived from quantitative frontal EEG. It is a development-stage physiological model rather than a routine bedside form.
Emerging context
EEG-derived physiological research model rather than a routine bedside instrument. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.
What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence
E-CAM-S is an automated research method that estimates delirium severity from quantitative frontal electroencephalography. It is not a patient questionnaire or a rapid bedside screen. The study calculated signals from four frontal bipolar EEG channels and extracted time- and frequency-domain measurements from repeated six-second epochs. Summary statistics across epochs produced 1,192 candidate inputs, which were reduced within a penalised learning-to-rank model. The resulting continuous score ranges from 0 to 1 and was trained to follow the ordering of clinical CAM-S values from 0 to 7. Higher values represent greater physiological abnormality associated with delirium severity; no practice-ready diagnostic threshold was established.
The retrospective study analysed 373 adults referred for EEG because of altered mental status at one tertiary academic hospital. Ten-fold patient-level internal cross-validation was used. E-CAM-S correlated with CAM-S at 0.68 in the full cohort, falling to 0.52 after comatose patients were excluded. Its area under the curve for separating non-delirious from delirious patients was 0.70. E-CAM-S was also associated with hospital mortality and length of stay.
This is promising physiological-model evidence, not external clinical validation. The selected cohort included many comatose patients, clinical CAM-S assessments came from multiple providers, and the clinical comparator was not an independent gold standard. Dementia, aphasia and non-English speakers were excluded, and sedative or other drug effects were not modelled directly. EEG availability and processing also limit routine use. E-CAM-S therefore belongs in the emerging physiological context register, not among ordinary bedside tools.
Evidence and practical details
- Full name
- Electroencephalographic Confusion Assessment Method Severity Score
- Catalogue class
- Emerging context
- Record type
- context-emerging
- Family
- eeg-delirium-severity-family
- Purpose
- Severity measurement, physiological, digital, Detailed research assessment
- Population
- Adults undergoing clinical EEG for altered mental status
- Setting
- General / acute hospital, Intensive care
- Items
- —
- Administration
- 20-60 min routine EEG or a 1-hour long-term-monitoring segment, plus automated processing
- Evidence
- No eligible DTA study identified
- Evidence maturity
- derivation-and-internal-cross-validation
- Evidence stage
- emerging-development-or-derivation
- DTA studies identified
- 0
- Reference type
- Retrospective single-centre derivation with patient-level ten-fold internal cross-validation
- Validation sample
- n = 373
- Cut-off / scoring
- No clinical diagnostic threshold
- Original/source citation
- van Sleuwen M, Sun H, Eckhardt C, et al. Physiological Assessment of Delirium Severity: The Electroencephalographic Confusion Assessment Method Severity Score (E-CAM-S) Critical Care Medicine. 2022;50(1):e11-e19. PMID 34582420
Format and clearly labelled links
The research pipeline used four frontal bipolar channels, 298 time- and frequency-domain features and four across-epoch summaries, then fitted a LASSO-penalised ordinal learning-to-rank model against CAM-S 0-7 values.
Rights, version and permission record
- Instrument access state
- No verified public instrument form
- Instrument host
- No verified instrument host
- Current instrument/version note
- E-CAM-S research model and BDSP project v1.0; source model published 2022
- Rights holder
- Not yet verified
- Licence / rights basis
- No licence verified
- Rights checked
- 2026-07-19
- Rights-holder contact
- Not yet verified
Permission scope recorded at the last check
- Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
- Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
- Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
- Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
- EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
- Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.
Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.
Page record and review status
- Page version
- 3.1.0
- Last factual/source check
- 2026-07-19
- Last rights/link check
- 2026-07-19
- Curator and responsible editor
- Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
- Independent external clinical review
- Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.
Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.
* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.