A guide to the directory
Where tools fit in the patient journey
Delirium assessment is a repeated clinical task. The setting changes, and the question may change with it.
Emergency and medical care
Emergency department
Look for recent change. Assess possible delirium when indicators are present.
Medical admissions
Review the assessment, baseline cognition and information from family or carers.
Hospital ward
Continue observation. Reassess when there is a new concern or a change.
Longer stay and discharge
Delirium may persist or recur. Record the course and communicate follow-up needs.
Perioperative care
Before surgery
Establish baseline cognition and look for delirium where indicated. Risk prediction is a separate task.
Recovery room / PACU
Account for anaesthesia, sedation and arousal. NICE names CAM-ICU or ICDSC here.
Postoperative ward
Continue observation and use a structured assessment when delirium is suspected.
Ongoing recovery
Reassess new or persisting problems. Include cognition and delirium in handover and follow-up.
Across the whole stay
Listen to the patient, family and staff. Watch for changes in attention, alertness and behaviour.
Arrange prompt structured assessment and clinical review. Do not wait for the end of a shift.
Assess possible causes and care needs. A negative score does not dismiss a convincing concern.
“Episodic” describes the assessment process. It does not mean that a patient should be assessed only once. On general wards, NICE recommends observation at least daily for changes suggesting delirium. The choice and frequency of formal monitoring scores need a clear local pathway.
This diagram adapts the patient-journey framework in Penfold et al. (2024), supplementary Figure 1, and Alasdair MacLullich’s teaching slides. It is a guide to the decisions, not a fixed assessment timetable.
Read the commentary on monitoring · Choose a tool
References
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2023) Delirium: prevention, diagnosis and management in hospital and long-term care. CG103, recommendations 1.5 and 1.6. Recommendations.
Penfold, R.S. et al. (2024) ‘Delirium detection tools show varying completion rates and positive score rates when used at scale in routine practice in general hospital settings: a systematic review’, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 72, pp. 1508–1524. Article and supplement.