AWOL-S — Age, WORLD backwards, Orientation, iLlness severity and Surgery-specific risk
2020A perioperative extension of AWOL that estimates postoperative delirium probability using age, brief cognition, illness severity and surgical risk. It predicts risk rather than detecting delirium.
Related context
Perioperative prediction of future delirium rather than current-delirium detection. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.
What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence
AWOL-S is a perioperative risk model derived from the earlier AWOL rule. Its name reflects age, ability to spell WORLD backwards, orientation to place, illness severity represented by ASA physical status, and surgery-specific risk. These inputs are combined into a predicted probability of delirium during the first seven postoperative days. The source programme classified patients at 5% or greater predicted probability as high risk. That threshold supported a local prevention pathway; it should not be treated as a universal diagnostic cutoff. AWOL-S does not identify delirium already present.
Whitlock and colleagues derived the model in 2,091 surgical patients and validated it in 908. Performance was also examined in a later sustained-use cohort. Reported areas under the curve were 0.71, 0.65 and 0.75 across those phases. At the operational 5% threshold, sensitivity was about 75% and specificity about 59-60%. Implementation was associated with modest changes in some medication practices, but observational quality-improvement findings do not prove that the score itself prevents delirium.
AWOL-S should be presented as a related surgery-specific version of AWOL, not another bedside detection family. It combines brief direct assessment with clinical and procedural information and may be embedded in an electronic record. Case mix, surgical coding and local delirium ascertainment affect calibration. High-risk patients still require clinical review and preventive care, while low-risk results cannot rule out postoperative delirium.
Evidence and practical details
- Full name
- Age, WORLD backwards, Orientation, iLlness severity and Surgery-specific risk
- Catalogue class
- Related context
- Record type
- context-related
- Family
- awol-family
- Related profiles
- AWOL
- Purpose
- Risk prediction, perioperative
- Population
- Adults undergoing surgery with at least an overnight hospital stay
- Setting
- Perioperative care, General / acute hospital
- Items
- 5
- Administration
- brief preoperative assessment plus electronic calculation; formal time not reported
- Evidence
- No eligible DTA study identified
- Evidence maturity
- derivation-validation-and-sustained-performance-cohorts
- Evidence stage
- contextual-source-only
- DTA studies identified
- 0
- Reference type
- Single-centre perioperative derivation, validation and sustained-performance cohorts
- Validation sample
- n = 2,091 derivation and 908 validation, with a later sustained-performance cohort
- Cut-off / scoring
- Five per cent predicted probability was used operationally in the source programme; local calibration is required
- Original/source citation
- Whitlock EL, et al. Derivation, validation, sustained performance, and clinical impact of an electronic medical record-based perioperative delirium risk stratification tool Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2020;131(6):1901-1910. PMID 33105280
Format and clearly labelled links
Rights, version and permission record
- Instrument access state
- No verified public instrument form
- Instrument host
- No verified instrument host
- Current instrument/version note
- No version verified
- Rights holder
- Not yet verified
- Licence / rights basis
- No licence verified
- Rights checked
- 2026-07-19
- Rights-holder contact
- Not yet verified
Permission scope recorded at the last check
- Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
- Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
- Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
- Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
- EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
- Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.
Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.
Page record and review status
- Page version
- 3.1.0
- Last factual/source check
- 2026-07-19
- Last rights/link check
- 2026-07-19
- Curator and responsible editor
- Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
- Independent external clinical review
- Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.
Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.
* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.