← All public profiles

AWOL-S — Age, WORLD backwards, Orientation, iLlness severity and Surgery-specific risk

2020

A perioperative extension of AWOL that estimates postoperative delirium probability using age, brief cognition, illness severity and surgical risk. It predicts risk rather than detecting delirium.

Risk predictionperioperativeNo eligible DTA study identifiedRelated context

Related context

Perioperative prediction of future delirium rather than current-delirium detection. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.

What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence

AWOL-S is a perioperative risk model derived from the earlier AWOL rule. Its name reflects age, ability to spell WORLD backwards, orientation to place, illness severity represented by ASA physical status, and surgery-specific risk. These inputs are combined into a predicted probability of delirium during the first seven postoperative days. The source programme classified patients at 5% or greater predicted probability as high risk. That threshold supported a local prevention pathway; it should not be treated as a universal diagnostic cutoff. AWOL-S does not identify delirium already present.

Whitlock and colleagues derived the model in 2,091 surgical patients and validated it in 908. Performance was also examined in a later sustained-use cohort. Reported areas under the curve were 0.71, 0.65 and 0.75 across those phases. At the operational 5% threshold, sensitivity was about 75% and specificity about 59-60%. Implementation was associated with modest changes in some medication practices, but observational quality-improvement findings do not prove that the score itself prevents delirium.

AWOL-S should be presented as a related surgery-specific version of AWOL, not another bedside detection family. It combines brief direct assessment with clinical and procedural information and may be embedded in an electronic record. Case mix, surgical coding and local delirium ascertainment affect calibration. High-risk patients still require clinical review and preventive care, while low-risk results cannot rule out postoperative delirium.

Evidence and practical details

approximately 75% at the 5% threshold
Sensitivity*
approximately 59-60% at the 5% threshold
Specificity*
n=2,091 derivation and 908 validation, with a later sustained-performance cohort
Sample
Full name
Age, WORLD backwards, Orientation, iLlness severity and Surgery-specific risk
Catalogue class
Related context
Record type
context-related
Family
awol-family
Related profiles
AWOL
Purpose
Risk prediction, perioperative
Population
Adults undergoing surgery with at least an overnight hospital stay
Setting
Perioperative care, General / acute hospital
Items
5
Administration
brief preoperative assessment plus electronic calculation; formal time not reported
Evidence
No eligible DTA study identified
Evidence maturity
derivation-validation-and-sustained-performance-cohorts
Evidence stage
contextual-source-only
DTA studies identified
0
Reference type
Single-centre perioperative derivation, validation and sustained-performance cohorts
Validation sample
n = 2,091 derivation and 908 validation, with a later sustained-performance cohort
Cut-off / scoring
Five per cent predicted probability was used operationally in the source programme; local calibration is required
Original/source citation
Whitlock EL, et al. Derivation, validation, sustained performance, and clinical impact of an electronic medical record-based perioperative delirium risk stratification tool Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2020;131(6):1901-1910. PMID 33105280

Format and clearly labelled links

Rights, version and permission record

Instrument access state
No verified public instrument form
Instrument host
No verified instrument host
Current instrument/version note
No version verified
Rights holder
Not yet verified
Licence / rights basis
No licence verified
Rights checked
2026-07-19
Rights-holder contact
Not yet verified

Permission scope recorded at the last check

  • Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
  • Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
  • Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
  • Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
  • EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
  • Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.

Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.

Page record and review status

Page version
3.1.0
Last factual/source check
2026-07-19
Last rights/link check
2026-07-19
Curator and responsible editor
Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
Independent external clinical review
Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.

Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.

* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.