← All public profiles

PrEDICT — Predicting Emergency department Delirium with an Interactive Computer Tablet

2019

A tablet-based serious game that records target-tapping speed and accuracy at four difficulty levels to flag unrecognised delirium in older emergency patients. Its sensitive threshold was derived in one cohort and had modest specificity.

Cognitive test for deliriumdigitalScreening / case-findingemergencyOne DTA study identifiedEmerging clinical record

Emerging clinical record

This record is at an emerging or derivation stage and is not counted as a mature independent family. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.

What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence

PrEDICT stands for Predicting Emergency department Delirium with an Interactive Computer Tablet. It is a tablet-based serious game developed to flag delirium-related cognitive and motor-performance change in older emergency patients. Participants tap visual targets across four difficulty levels while the application records time and accuracy automatically. The abstract does not give a stable total completion time or the numerical threshold, so neither should be invented. App guidance simplifies delivery, but staff must consider vision, motor ability, language and capacity to use a tablet.

Lee and colleagues conducted a prospective observational study of 203 emergency-department patients aged 70 or older who had not been recognised as delirious in routine care. Critically ill people and those with communication barriers, visual impairment or inability to use the tablet were excluded. Sixteen participants had unrecognised delirium. Overall completion was 196 of 203, and 14 of the 16 delirium cases completed the game. A threshold derived in that same cohort produced sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 59.7% and an area under the curve of 0.86.

PrEDICT is promising and genuinely designed for delirium case-finding, but it remains an emerging component screen. The perfect sensitivity estimate rests on only 16 cases and lacks external validation. Exclusions also matter when judging real-world usability. The page should report these design limitations, link to the primary study and avoid implying that target-tapping performance establishes acute onset, fluctuation or a clinical diagnosis.

Evidence and practical details

100%
Sensitivity*
59.7%
Specificity*
n=203
Sample
Full name
Predicting Emergency department Delirium with an Interactive Computer Tablet
Also known as
PrEDICT serious game, Predict Emergency Delirium Interactive Computer Tablet
Catalogue class
Emerging clinical record
Record type
core-emerging
Family
predict-digital-cognitive-screen
Purpose
Cognitive test for delirium, digital, Screening / case-finding, emergency
Population
Adult
Setting
Emergency department
Items
Administration
brief tablet task; exact total completion time not reported
Evidence
One DTA study identified
Evidence maturity
derivation-only
Evidence stage
emerging-development-or-derivation
DTA studies identified
1
Current audit status
provisional DTA identified
Reference type
Original/source and earliest DTA study
Reference standard
Clinically unrecognized delirium comparator not fully described in the accessible original abstracts; concurrent measures explicitly include CAM and Delirium Severity Index, but the precise final reference process requires full-text confirmation
Validation sample
n = 203
Cut-off / scoring
Data-derived threshold; numerical value not reported in the accessible abstract
Original/source citation
Lee JS, Tong T, Tierney MC, Kiss A, Chignell M Predictive Ability of a Serious Game to Identify Emergency Patients With Unrecognized Delirium Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019;67(11):2370-2375. PMID 31355442

Format and clearly labelled links

PrEDICT presents target-tapping tasks of increasing difficulty and records time and accuracy automatically. The page should not invent the unpublished numerical threshold or represent the game as a complete diagnostic assessment.

Rights, version and permission record

Instrument access state
No verified public instrument form
Instrument host
No verified instrument host
Current instrument/version note
No version verified
Rights holder
Not yet verified
Licence / rights basis
No licence verified
Rights checked
2026-07-19
Rights-holder contact
Not yet verified

Permission scope recorded at the last check

  • Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
  • Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
  • Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
  • Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
  • EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
  • Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.

Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.

Page record and review status

Page version
3.1.0
Last factual/source check
2026-07-19
Last rights/link check
2026-07-19
Curator and responsible editor
Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
Independent external clinical review
Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.

Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.

* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.