MDP — Mayo Delirium Prediction tool
2021An automated 19-variable hospital risk model that estimates the probability of developing delirium. It supports prevention and systematic assessment; it does not detect delirium already present.
Related context
Risk prediction for future delirium rather than current-delirium detection. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.
What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence
The Mayo Delirium Prediction (MDP) tool is an electronic risk-stratification model for predicting delirium during hospitalisation; it is not a test for delirium that is already present. It uses information available during the first hospital day for medical and surgical patients aged 50 years or older. Nineteen structured EHR variables cover age, previous delirium and cognitive or psychiatric diagnoses, care setting and admission route, selected treatments and comorbidities, fall risk, laboratory results, pressure ulcer and fracture. The model returns a predicted probability classified as low at 5% or less, moderate at 6-29%, or high at 30% or more. Admissions for acute substance intoxication or withdrawal were treated as high risk outside the calculated model.
The retrospective development study included 120,764 Mayo Clinic admissions: 80,000 for derivation and 40,764 allocated to validation. AUROC was .85 and .84 respectively, with similar observed delirium rates across risk groups. Subsequent modified and external validations support the approach, including a recent cancer-centre cohort, but versions and calibration should not be assumed interchangeable.
The original outcome came from electronic physician diagnoses of delirium or encephalopathy and nursing CAM-ICU documentation, so missed or undocumented cases could affect the model. The cohort was predominantly White, and implementation depends on local EHR definitions, data completeness and recalibration. MDP identifies people who may merit prevention and systematic assessment; it neither confirms nor excludes delirium and should never replace bedside evaluation.
Evidence and practical details
- Full name
- Mayo Delirium Prediction tool
- Catalogue class
- Related context
- Record type
- context-related
- Family
- mayo-delirium-prediction-family
- Purpose
- Risk prediction
- Population
- Adult
- Setting
- General / acute hospital
- Items
- 19
- Administration
- automated calculation from first-hospital-day EHR data; no bedside administration time
- Evidence
- No eligible DTA study identified
- Evidence maturity
- external-validation
- Evidence stage
- contextual-validation-or-psychometric-evidence
- DTA studies identified
- 0
- Reference type
- Retrospective derivation and validation allocation with later external evaluation
- Validation sample
- n = 120,764 admissions: 80,000 derivation and 40,764 validation allocation
- Cut-off / scoring
- Low 5% or less; moderate 6-29%; high 30% or more; acute substance intoxication or withdrawal designated high risk
- Original/source citation
- Pagali SR, Miller D, Fischer K, Schroeder D, Egger N, Manning DM, Lapid MI, Pignolo RJ, Burton MC Predicting Delirium Risk Using an Automated Mayo Delirium Prediction Tool: Development and Validation of a Risk-Stratification Model Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2021;96(5):1229-1235. PMID 33581839
Format and clearly labelled links
Rights, version and permission record
- Instrument access state
- No verified public instrument form
- Instrument host
- No verified instrument host
- Current instrument/version note
- Original automated Mayo Delirium Prediction model reported in 2021; no public implementation verified
- Rights holder
- Not yet verified
- Licence / rights basis
- No licence verified
- Rights checked
- 2026-07-19
- Rights-holder contact
- Not yet verified
Permission scope recorded at the last check
- Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
- Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
- Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
- Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
- EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
- Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.
Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.
Page record and review status
- Page version
- 3.1.0
- Last factual/source check
- 2026-07-19
- Last rights/link check
- 2026-07-19
- Curator and responsible editor
- Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
- Independent external clinical review
- Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.
Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.
* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.