LSD-4 — Letter and Shape Drawing test
2017A four-drawing visuoconstruction screen evaluated for delirium case-finding in older medical inpatients. It takes about one to two minutes and is a cognitive component test rather than a stand-alone clinical diagnosis.
What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence
Published in 2017, LSD-4 is described here as screening / case-finding, cognitive test for delirium for older hospital patients with delirium/dementia comparison groups. The linked study examined it in General / acute hospital. The recorded form contains 4 scored items or observations. The reported administration time is approximately 1-2 min. The catalogue records the published scoring or threshold information as Total 0-4; 3 or less classified abnormal/positive in the 2020 delirium evaluation.
The linked source is Williams OA and colleagues, A simple drawing test for identifying visuospatial executive dysfunction in older people in Psychiatry Research (2017); this catalogue treats it as original/source and earliest DTA study. For LSD-4, the evidence stage is one eligible diagnostic-accuracy study. The reconciled DTA dataset associates 1 eligible study with LSD-4. The earliest listed evaluation used Full neuropsychiatric reference using DSM-IV and/or DRS-R98 ≥15 as its reference standard. The first recorded accuracy result reports sensitivity 74% and specificity 75%; the recorded sample is 180. 2020 delirium evaluation in 180 older medical inpatients; the 2017 paper is the canonical test-development source.
The LSD-4 case-finding role should be kept separate from a full clinical diagnosis and investigation of underlying causes. For LSD-4, no verified public instrument form is recorded; the source article documents the tool but is not a substitute administration form.
Evidence and practical details
- Full name
- Letter and Shape Drawing test
- Also known as
- LSD-4
- Catalogue class
- Core instrument family
- Record type
- core-family
- Family
- lsd-4
- Purpose
- Screening / case-finding, Cognitive test for delirium
- Population
- Adult
- Setting
- General / acute hospital
- Items
- 4
- Administration
- approximately 1-2 min
- Evidence
- One DTA study identified
- Evidence maturity
- single
- Evidence stage
- diagnostic-accuracy-single-study
- DTA studies identified
- 1
- Current audit status
- provisional DTA identified
- Reference type
- Original/source and earliest DTA study
- Reference standard
- Full neuropsychiatric reference using DSM-IV and/or DRS-R98 ≥15
- Validation sample
- n = 180
- Cut-off / scoring
- Total 0-4; 3 or less classified abnormal/positive in the 2020 delirium evaluation
- Original/source citation
- Williams OA, et al. A simple drawing test for identifying visuospatial executive dysfunction in older people Psychiatry Research. 2017;247:317-322. PMID 27951480
Format and clearly labelled links
A four-drawing visuoconstruction screen completed in about one to two minutes. Each drawing contributes to a four-point total; the study classified scores of 3 or less as abnormal/positive. Use the open primary article for the drawings and exact scoring.
Rights, version and permission record
- Instrument access state
- No verified public instrument form
- Instrument host
- No verified instrument host
- Current instrument/version note
- No version verified
- Rights holder
- Not yet verified
- Licence / rights basis
- No licence verified
- Rights checked
- 2026-07-19
- Rights-holder contact
- Not yet verified
Permission scope recorded at the last check
- Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
- Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
- Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
- Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
- EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
- Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.
Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.
Page record and review status
- Page version
- 3.1.0
- Last factual/source check
- 2026-07-19
- Last rights/link check
- 2026-07-19
- Curator and responsible editor
- Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
- Independent external clinical review
- Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.
Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.
* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.