← All public profiles

K-APDS — Korean Adult Patients Delirium Screening Tool

2023

A 12-observation Korean-language nurse screen developed for adults on general wards. It is a genuine emerging tool, but its same-study evaluation used another observational screen rather than a blinded specialist diagnosis.

Screening / case-findingMonitoring / repeated screeningNo eligible DTA study identifiedEmerging clinical record

Emerging clinical record

This record is at an emerging or derivation stage and is not counted as a mature independent family. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.

What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence

K-APDS is a Korean-language nursing observation screen developed for adults admitted to general hospital wards. It contains 12 binary observations grouped into two factors: eight reflecting cognitive disturbance and four reflecting psychomotor retardation. The responsible nurse scores features observed while caring for the patient during a work shift, making it an observational screen rather than a one-time cognitive interview. Scores range from 0 to 12, and the development paper proposed a threshold of two or more for a positive screen. A positive result should prompt fuller clinical assessment; it is not itself a diagnosis.

The study involved 317 adults from general wards in three Korean tertiary hospitals during October and November 2022. Two-factor analysis explained 60.1% of variance, internal consistency was high, and correlation with the Delirium Observation Screening Scale was 0.94. At the proposed threshold, the authors reported sensitivity of 91.1%, specificity of 82.4%, positive predictive value of 52.6% and negative predictive value of 97.8%.

Those figures require cautious presentation. The comparator used for criterion validity was another observational screen, not a blinded independent specialist DSM assessment. Development and evaluation occurred in the same study, inter-rater agreement was not assessed, and several clinically complex groups were excluded. The authors also discuss possible missed hypoactive cases arising from routine referral practice. K-APDS is therefore a genuine emerging delirium screen, but it should remain non-counted until independent reference-standard validation and broader replication are available.

Evidence and practical details

91.1%
Sensitivity*
82.4%
Specificity*
n=317
Sample
Full name
Korean Adult Patients Delirium Screening Tool
Catalogue class
Emerging clinical record
Record type
core-emerging
Family
k-apds-family
Related profiles
DOSS
Purpose
Screening / case-finding, Monitoring / repeated screening
Population
Adult
Setting
General / acute hospital
Items
12
Administration
nurse observation during a work shift; exact minutes not reported
Evidence
No eligible DTA study identified
Evidence maturity
development-and-internal-validation
Evidence stage
emerging-development-or-derivation
DTA studies identified
0
Reference type
Development and same-sample psychometric and criterion evaluation
Reference standard
Delirium Observation Screening Scale rather than a blinded specialist DSM assessment
Validation sample
n = 317
Cut-off / scoring
Total 2 or more of 12
Original/source citation
Jeong HW, et al. Development of a Korean Adult Patients Delirium Screening Tool Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2023;29(2):198-209. doi:10.22650/JKCNR.2023.29.2.198

Format and clearly labelled links

Twelve binary nurse-observed features form an eight-observation cognitive-impairment factor and a four-observation psychomotor-retardation factor. The responsible nurse rates observations made during the work shift.

Rights, version and permission record

Instrument access state
Publisher article route not verified as reusable form
Instrument host
No verified instrument host
Current instrument/version note
Original 2023 Korean general-ward 12-item K-APDS
Rights holder
Not yet verified
Licence / rights basis
No licence verified
Rights checked
2026-07-19
Rights-holder contact
Not yet verified

Permission scope recorded at the last check

  • Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
  • Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
  • Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
  • Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
  • EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
  • Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.

Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.

Page record and review status

Page version
3.1.0
Last factual/source check
2026-07-19
Last rights/link check
2026-07-19
Curator and responsible editor
Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
Independent external clinical review
Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.

Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.

* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.