← All public profiles

DEMS: Delirium Early Monitoring System

2016

A nurse-led early monitoring system implemented through two pathways, DEMS-CAM and DEMS-DOSS, rather than a single undifferentiated questionnaire.

At a glance

Purpose
Episodic assessment
Population
Adult
Time
varies by DEMS-CAM and DEMS-DOSS pathway
Score or threshold
DEMS-DOSS positive

Format: DEMS is a clinical monitoring system with CAM-based and DOSS-based versions. Its structure and timing depend on the selected pathway, so a single item count or administration time would be misleading.

Primary validation papers

1 identified diagnostic-accuracy paper

Other forms of validation are described in the evidence section. What is counted?

Large-scale clinical implementation

Not yet reviewed.

A focused implementation review has not yet been completed for this profile.

Training and instructions

Public training resources have not yet been confirmed in this review. Check the linked developer or original source for instructions.

Start here

Tool and original sources

No direct copy is linked here. The original paper and a Google Images search are available below. Image results may be unofficial; check the version and source before use.

Original and selected diagnostic-accuracy papers

  • Original paperRippon D, Milisen K, Detroyer E, Mukaetova-Ladinska E, Harrison B, Schuurmans M, et al. Evaluation of the delirium early monitoring system (DEMS). International psychogeriatrics. 2016;28(11):1879-1887. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000983. PMID: 27443322.

    This is the original published source for DEMS. It is the main source for the method, its intended use and the evidence available at publication.

  • Selected diagnostic-accuracy studyMontgomery A, Todd JA, Jones C, Koroitamana J, Grealish L, Wand A, et al. The DEMS-DOSS study: validating a delirium monitoring tool in hospitalised older adults. Age and ageing. 2022;51(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac012. PMID: 35192683.

    This diagnostic-accuracy study evaluated DEMS in 60-bed metropolitan-hospital aged-care precinct against a DSM-IV clinical assessment. It reported sensitivity of 76.3% and specificity of 75.8% in 100 analysed participants aged 65 years or older.

    Article PDF: CC BY. This licence applies to the article PDF and does not grant rights to reproduce the tool.

One DTA study identifiedAssessment workflow
Classification

Classification

A tool may belong to more than one category. Select a linked category to see other relevant profiles.

Evidence

Diagnostic-accuracy evidenceOne DTA study identified

Reported sensitivity and specificity

;
Sensitivity
;
Specificity

Pilot of a nurse-completed monitoring system (DEMS-CAM / DEMS-DOSS); completion 79% / 68% on a psychogeriatric ward.

More evidence and citation details
Full name
Delirium Early Monitoring System
Also known as
DEMS
Related profiles
CAM, DOSS
Evidence summary
external-validation
Diagnostic-accuracy evaluations
1
Reference standard
Blinded nurse DSM-IV assessment
Citation
Rippon D, Milisen K, Detroyer E, Mukaetova-Ladinska E, Harrison B, Schuurmans M, Pryor C, Teodorczuk A Evaluation of the delirium early monitoring system (DEMS) International psychogeriatrics. 2016;28(11):1879-1887. PMID 27443322

Primary validation studies

Distinct primary publications from the current diagnostic-accuracy audit. Reviews and repeated evaluations within one paper are not counted again. Overlapping cohorts have not all been reconciled. Read the counting rules and limitations.

Open 1 identified paper
  1. Montgomery A, Todd JA, Jones C, Koroitamana J, Grealish L, Wand A, Billett S, Teodorczuk A (2022). The DEMS-DOSS study: validating a delirium monitoring tool in hospitalised older adults. Age and ageing.

    Reference category: independent clinical reference.

Copyright and reuse
Information checked
2026-07-19

Instrument-specific terms apply. See the access and copyright policy or send a correction.

Base clinical review: 2026-07-29. Instrument description source check: 2026-09-05. Scope and limitations.