← All public profiles

DELIKT — DELIrium risK Tool

2023

A single-centre EHR-derived score for incident delirium risk in older non-ICU inpatients. It is a prediction model requiring external and implementation validation, not a current-delirium screen.

Risk predictiondigitalinpatientNo eligible DTA study identifiedRelated context

Related context

Prediction of incident delirium in older inpatients rather than current-delirium detection. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.

What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence

DELIKT is a points-based model for predicting incident delirium in older hospital patients outside intensive care. It was designed for potential automation from information recorded during the first 24 hours of admission. Candidate electronic variables were reduced statistically and converted into a score from 0 to 98. In the source cohort, a score above 20 was associated with later delirium and provided sensitivity of 79.7% and specificity of 62.3%. The authors note that a service could choose a different threshold depending on whether sensitivity or specificity is more important. Such a change requires local evaluation rather than assuming unchanged performance.

Schulthess-Lisibach and colleagues used retrospective data from more than 10,000 admissions at one Swiss hospital. Delirium outcomes drew on routine DOSS or CAM documentation, and the Clinical Risk Assessment Scale contributed to the model. The study included development and internal validation, but no independent hospital was used for external validation. Missing or inconsistent routine screening could therefore influence both model building and reported accuracy.

DELIKT is a promising implementation-oriented risk score, not a diagnostic test for delirium already present. Its exact electronic definitions and points should be taken from the original publication and supplementary material, not reconstructed from this commentary. External validation, recalibration and impact testing are needed before broad adoption. A high score should trigger prevention and systematic assessment; a low score cannot safely exclude a later acute change.

Evidence and practical details

79.7%
Sensitivity*
62.3%
Specificity*
n=More than 10,000 admissions
Sample
Full name
DELIrium risK Tool
Catalogue class
Related context
Record type
context-related
Family
delikt-family
Purpose
Risk prediction, digital, inpatient
Population
Older non-intensive-care hospital inpatients without delirium at baseline
Setting
General / acute hospital
Items
Administration
potentially automated from EHR data in the first 24 hours
Evidence
No eligible DTA study identified
Evidence maturity
single-centre-retrospective-development-and-internal-validation
Evidence stage
contextual-source-only
DTA studies identified
0
Reference type
Single-centre retrospective EHR derivation and validation
Validation sample
n = More than 10,000 admissions
Cut-off / scoring
More than 20 points was associated with incident delirium in the source cohort; thresholds may be adapted and require external validation
Original/source citation
Schulthess-Lisibach AE, Gallucci G, Benelli V, et al. Predicting delirium in older non-intensive care unit inpatients: development and validation of the DELIrium risK Tool (DELIKT) International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2023;45(5):1118-1127. PMID 37061661

Format and clearly labelled links

Rights, version and permission record

Instrument access state
No verified public instrument form
Instrument host
No verified instrument host
Current instrument/version note
No version verified
Rights holder
Not yet verified
Licence / rights basis
No licence verified
Rights checked
2026-07-19
Rights-holder contact
Not yet verified

Permission scope recorded at the last check

  • Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
  • Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
  • Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
  • Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
  • EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
  • Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.

Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.

Page record and review status

Page version
3.1.0
Last factual/source check
2026-07-19
Last rights/link check
2026-07-19
Curator and responsible editor
Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
Independent external clinical review
Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.

Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.

* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.