← All public profiles

Auto-DelRAS — Automated Delirium Risk Assessment System

2018

An eleven-predictor EHR system that displays ICU delirium risk categories and was followed after implementation. It predicts future risk and does not replace direct delirium assessment.

Risk predictiondigitalIntensive careNo eligible DTA study identifiedRelated context

Related context

Automated prediction of future ICU delirium rather than current-delirium detection. This profile remains public for clinical and bibliographic context, but it does not add to the headline count of independent core families.

What this tool is and how to interpret its evidence

Auto-DelRAS is an electronic system designed to identify ICU patients at increased risk of developing delirium. It uses 11 predictors already available in the health record, covering demographic and neurological information, physiological measurements, clinical service, infection, laboratory data and aspects of treatment or care. The implemented system displayed high, moderate or low risk on a clinical screen so that nurses could consider preventive action. It does not perform a bedside delirium assessment, and its risk category must not be interpreted as a current diagnosis.

Moon and colleagues developed the model using 3,284 medical and surgical ICU patients in Seoul. A further 325 patients were used for external validation, and performance after clinical implementation was examined in 694 patients. At one year the authors reported sensitivity of 0.88, specificity of 0.72, positive predictive value of 0.53 and negative predictive value of 0.94. These values depend on delirium prevalence, predictor availability and the source hospitals' workflow.

Auto-DelRAS is notable because the investigators assessed sustained performance after integration rather than reporting only model development. Even so, it was built within two Korean university hospitals, and a local EHR implementation would require technical mapping, governance, validation and monitoring for drift. This page gives only the number and broad nature of predictors; the paper is the authoritative source for definitions. The system can prompt prevention and repeated screening, but it cannot rule delirium in or out.

Evidence and practical details

88%
Sensitivity*
72%
Specificity*
n=3,284 development, 325 external validation and 694 post-implementation evaluation participants
Sample
Full name
Automated Delirium Risk Assessment System
Catalogue class
Related context
Record type
context-related
Family
auto-delras-family
Purpose
Risk prediction, digital, Intensive care
Population
Adults admitted to medical and surgical intensive-care units
Setting
Intensive care
Items
11
Administration
automatically calculated from electronic health-record data
Evidence
No eligible DTA study identified
Evidence maturity
development-external-validation-and-post-implementation-follow-up
Evidence stage
contextual-source-only
DTA studies identified
0
Reference type
Development, separate validation and post-implementation evaluation in two Korean hospitals
Validation sample
n = 3,284 development, 325 external validation and 694 post-implementation evaluation participants
Cut-off / scoring
System-specific risk categories; not a delirium diagnostic threshold
Original/source citation
Moon KJ, Jin Y, Jin T, Lee SM Development and validation of an automated delirium risk assessment system (Auto-DelRAS) implemented in the electronic health record system International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2018;77:46-53. PMID 29035732

Format and clearly labelled links

Rights, version and permission record

Instrument access state
No verified public instrument form
Instrument host
No verified instrument host
Current instrument/version note
No version verified
Rights holder
Not yet verified
Licence / rights basis
No licence verified
Rights checked
2026-07-19
Rights-holder contact
Not yet verified

Permission scope recorded at the last check

  • Clinical use: Not verified; obtain the current authorised instrument and follow its terms.
  • Research use: Not verified; check with the developer or rights holder.
  • Web republication: Not verified; do not reproduce the form or item wording.
  • Translation/adaptation: Not verified; written permission may be required.
  • EHR/software integration: Not verified; check before implementation.
  • Commercial use: Not verified; check before use.

Site-text licence boundary: the CC BY 4.0 notice for original deliriumtools.com editorial text does not cover third-party instruments, item wording, forms, article text, logos, screenshots or linked material.

Page record and review status

Page version
3.1.0
Last factual/source check
2026-07-19
Last rights/link check
2026-07-19
Curator and responsible editor
Professor Alasdair M J MacLullich — Curator factual and source review complete (not an independent external reviewer)
Independent external clinical review
Not yet completed. No independent external reviewer, consortium endorsement or institutional endorsement is claimed.

Corrections and rights-holder notices can be submitted through the contribute and corrections page.

* Where shown, sensitivity/specificity are from the cited evaluation and are not pooled estimates. “DTA studies identified” describes the current audit, not a completed systematic-review count. Citation metadata checked against PubMed or a publisher record does not imply validation, study quality, endorsement or suitability for a setting. See Methodology.