A two-component abbreviation of the nine-content-score CTD, combining visual attention span with picture-recognition memory. Its favourable threshold performance was derived in the original CTD validation sample, not independently validated.
Format: aCTD sums two CTD content scores and applies a published 10/11 cut point. The full tasks and scoring instructions should be obtained from the article rather than reproduced on the commentary page.
Public training resources have not yet been confirmed in this review. Check the linked developer or original source for instructions.
This record describes a method rather than a downloadable bedside form. The main source is linked below.
This is the original published source for aCTD. It reported sensitivity of 94.7% and specificity of 98.8% against an independent DSM-III-R clinical assessment.
A tool may belong to more than one category. Select a linked category to see other relevant profiles.
Original/source study · 1997; pmid:9330241
Earliest DTA evaluation identified in the current audit; see the linked source and methodological caveats.
Distinct primary publications from the current diagnostic-accuracy audit. Reviews and repeated evaluations within one paper are not counted again. Overlapping cohorts have not all been reconciled. Read the counting rules and limitations.
Reference category: other comparator or secondary accuracy evidence.
Instrument-specific terms apply. See the access and copyright policy or send a correction.
Base clinical review: 2026-07-29. Instrument description source check: 2026-09-05. Scope and limitations.